Politicians and Election, Vote in Freedom, Actively Participate in Democracy, Vote for Change, Online referendum
left right close

Nuclear Energy

> global > Events > Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Energy is ready for your opinion, support and vote. Vote online NOW!
Positive
 
Negative
photo Atomic Energy - FOR

Atomic Energy - FOR

Click, if you support the atomic energy and its use. Say WHY?!
Atomic Energy - AGAINST

Atomic Energy - AGAINST

Click, if you do not support the atomic energy and its use. Say WHY?!

Online election results for "Atomic Energy - FOR" in graph.

graph
Graph online : Nuclear Energy
Full functionality only if Javascript and Flash is enabled
ENG: Atomic energy is energy produced by atoms. Nuclear energy, the energy resulting of potential difference of the nuclear force. Nuclear reaction, a process in which two nuclei or nuclear particles collide, to produce different products than the initial products; see also nuclear fission and nuclear fusion. Nuclear power, the use of nuclear reactions to produce electricity in nuclear reactors.Radioactive decay, the set of various processes by which unstable atomic nuclei (nuclides) emit subatomic particles. The energy of inter-atomic or chemical bonds, which holds atoms together in compounds. The term originated in 1903 when Ernest Rutherford began to speak of the possibility of atomic energy. The term was popularized by H. G. Wells in the phrase, "splitting the atom", ...
for33against   I clearly support the atomic energy (nuclear power). No reason to hesitate. For instance, because it... (if I wanted to write why, I wrote it here), positive
for1against   I think we need the atomic energy, there´s no reason to hasitate., barby
for33against   I am strongly opposed the atomic energy (nuclear power). I do not support it. For instance, because it... (if I wanted to write why, I wrote it here), negative
Current preference ratio
for Atomic Energy - FOR

Unsure about nuclear power? Here's the five questions ...


... you must answer to decide Twenty five years on from Chernobyl, the heated debate on nuclear power remains resistant to cold facts: simply too few are known. But making your own judgements on five key questions will lead to your answer Containing the elemental forces that rage inside a nuclear reactor is one of the great achievements of science, but losing control, as happened 25 years ago on Tuesday at Chernobyl, is one of its greatest failures. So what to think of nuclear power? People often ask me if I support or oppose the building of new nuclear power stations, presuming I ...


International Atomic Energy Agency Briefing on Fukushima ...


... Nuclear Accident On Monday, 18 April 2011, the IAEA provided the following information on the current status of nuclear safety in Japan: 1. Current Situation Overall, the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant remains very serious but there are early signs of recovery in some functions, such as electrical power and instrumentation. On 17th April, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) announced that TEPCO had issued a "Roadmap towards Restoration from the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station". The roadmap outlines 63 measures to be ...


Say no to nuclear power: Nobel Laureates


Nobel Peace Laureates today asked all countries, including India and China, to invest in safer forms of renewable energy instead of nuclear energy in the backdrop of recent atomic disaster in Japan. "It is time to recognize that nuclear power is not a clean, safe or affordable source of energy," said the letter written by nine laureates including Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Adolfo Perez Esquivel and Jose Ramos Horta. The women laureates are Betty Williams, Mairead Maguire, Rigoberta Menchu Tum, Jody Williams, Shirin Ebadi and Wangari Maathai. Read more: indian express.com (Apr 21 2011)


[TOP 4]

> Nuclear Energy > News

The support to construction of Russian-Finnish NPP Hanhikivi-1 in Finland remains to be strong
The support to construction of Russian-Finnish NPP Hanhikivi-1 in Finland remains to be strong. This was reported to ITAR-TASS by Mrs. Minna Forsstrem, the project director of Fennovoima engaged in the NPP construction jointly with Rosatom.«The support was always stably strong. In this context nothing changed when Rosatom joined the project. She emphasized very favorable public relation to the Russian partner. In her words currently 70 % of public in Puhajoki, the town where the NPP is to be constructed, support the project. “It is a difficult task to achieve better indicators” – she added.Both Finnish and Russian companies informed the public in Puhajoki that the future NPP is practically safe for local environment. «The biggest effect will be from the warm water. We will take the water from the sea for cooling purposes and then it will come back to the sea. This is, in fact, the only impact of the NPP to the environment. And light noise. All corresponding calculations are
NSQ-100: ‘Plane’ sailing for nuclear supply chain?
Précis:  Airliner OEMs are reporting a quality control programme in the supply chain that has yielded significant savings. A new programme emerging from the nuclear sector aims to learn from this experience. “International organisations issue guidance to member states and licensees but it is guidance and not mandatory. That’s the same for aerospace and nuclear. However, in aerospace there is far more consistency and cooperation between regulators and regulations,” explains Greg Kaser,senior project manager at the World Nuclear Association (WNA). Image:  Primary Event:  Nuclear Supply Chain Conference, Europe Premium`:  No Image Caption:  NSQ-100 –
UAE health & safety put to the test
Précis:  Contractors building nuclear power plants in the Middle East will be wise to keep construction worker health and safety at the top of the agenda to retain credibility. Construction worker health and safety will need to be a top priority for contractors pondering nuclear projects in the Middle East, sources have warned. “Overall there is a big gap between the standards employers want, and the implementation,” says Jean-Maxime Long, Middle East managing Director at Allen & York Recruitment, a recruitment consultancy specialising in energy projects. Image:  Primary Event:  5th Annual Nuclear Construction Conference, MENA Premium`:  No Image Caption: 
Global factors adding to uprate slow down
Précis:  Power plant uprates seem likely to dwindle as data from the world’s largest nuclear market, the US, indicates fewer approvals in years to come. We look at the global factors and mass uprate programmes in recent years contributing to the uprate slow-down. But could things change direction? Global uprate activity looks set to fall given a sharp decline in forthcoming approvals in the USA, the world’s largest nuclear market. As of the end of March 2014, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) had approved 154 power uprates, representing 7,035MWe of new power. “Collectively, these uprates have added generating capacity equivalent to about seven new reactors,” says the NRC web site. There were also up rates pending review for eight reactors, totalling 827MWe. Image:  Primary Event: 



 
nuclear energy examples, Atomic energy, ATOMIC ENERGY, энергия связи ядра, energy symbol and more...
load menu