Politicians and Election, Vote in Freedom, Actively Participate in Democracy, Vote for Change, Online referendum
left right close

Nuclear Energy

> global > Events > Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Energy is ready for your opinion, support and vote. Vote online NOW!
Positive
 
Negative
photo Atomic Energy - FOR

Atomic Energy - FOR

Click, if you support the atomic energy and its use. Say WHY?!
Atomic Energy - AGAINST

Atomic Energy - AGAINST

Click, if you do not support the atomic energy and its use. Say WHY?!

Online election results for "Atomic Energy - FOR" in graph.

graph
Graph online : Nuclear Energy
Full functionality only if Javascript and Flash is enabled
ENG: Atomic energy is energy produced by atoms. Nuclear energy, the energy resulting of potential difference of the nuclear force. Nuclear reaction, a process in which two nuclei or nuclear particles collide, to produce different products than the initial products; see also nuclear fission and nuclear fusion. Nuclear power, the use of nuclear reactions to produce electricity in nuclear reactors.Radioactive decay, the set of various processes by which unstable atomic nuclei (nuclides) emit subatomic particles. The energy of inter-atomic or chemical bonds, which holds atoms together in compounds. The term originated in 1903 when Ernest Rutherford began to speak of the possibility of atomic energy. The term was popularized by H. G. Wells in the phrase, "splitting the atom", ...
for33against   I clearly support the atomic energy (nuclear power). No reason to hesitate. For instance, because it... (if I wanted to write why, I wrote it here), positive
for1against   I think we need the atomic energy, there´s no reason to hasitate., barby
for33against   I am strongly opposed the atomic energy (nuclear power). I do not support it. For instance, because it... (if I wanted to write why, I wrote it here), negative
Current preference ratio
for Atomic Energy - FOR

Unsure about nuclear power? Here's the five questions ...


... you must answer to decide Twenty five years on from Chernobyl, the heated debate on nuclear power remains resistant to cold facts: simply too few are known. But making your own judgements on five key questions will lead to your answer Containing the elemental forces that rage inside a nuclear reactor is one of the great achievements of science, but losing control, as happened 25 years ago on Tuesday at Chernobyl, is one of its greatest failures. So what to think of nuclear power? People often ask me if I support or oppose the building of new nuclear power stations, presuming I ...


International Atomic Energy Agency Briefing on Fukushima ...


... Nuclear Accident On Monday, 18 April 2011, the IAEA provided the following information on the current status of nuclear safety in Japan: 1. Current Situation Overall, the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant remains very serious but there are early signs of recovery in some functions, such as electrical power and instrumentation. On 17th April, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) announced that TEPCO had issued a "Roadmap towards Restoration from the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station". The roadmap outlines 63 measures to be ...


Say no to nuclear power: Nobel Laureates


Nobel Peace Laureates today asked all countries, including India and China, to invest in safer forms of renewable energy instead of nuclear energy in the backdrop of recent atomic disaster in Japan. "It is time to recognize that nuclear power is not a clean, safe or affordable source of energy," said the letter written by nine laureates including Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Adolfo Perez Esquivel and Jose Ramos Horta. The women laureates are Betty Williams, Mairead Maguire, Rigoberta Menchu Tum, Jody Williams, Shirin Ebadi and Wangari Maathai. Read more: indian express.com (Apr 21 2011)


[TOP 4]

> Nuclear Energy > News

Decommissioning Fukushima: not a task to take on alone?
Précis:  While reports coming out of the IAEA signal Japan has made good progress in remediating the area around the damaged Fukushima plant, some in the industry believe the decommissioning task is not a job for a single nation. By Elisabeth Jeffries Additional reporting by K. Steiner-Dicks Japan has made good progress in remediating the area around the damaged Fukushima plant, as well as planning the decommissioning process, according to two new reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). However, some believe the views made so far are too narrow given the huge decommissioning task that Japan, as a single nation, should understandably not take on its own. Image:  Primary Event:  5th Annual Nuclear Decommissioning Conference Premium`: 
Popular Mechanics Calls Joe Mangano's Research, "Junk Science"
For years, we've been telling you about freelance anti-nuclear activist Joe Mangano and how he leverages flawed research to stoke fears about nuclear energy. Now, another serious science writer has taken a closer look at Mangano's studies and says it's part of a larger trend of agenda-driven science being peddled to the press.On newsstands now is the April 2014 issue of Popular Mechanics. There you'll find a feature (yet to be published online) titled, "Junk Science." In it, Science Editor Sarah Fecht investigates a claim that Mangano and Janette Sherman made in 2012 that 14,000 American deaths could be linked to fallout from Fukushima Daiichi.Interviewed for the piece is Dr. Robert Emery of the University of Texas at Houston:"I read the thing and was taken aback," says Emery, who has a doctorate in public health and is a licensed health physicist. The study implied fallout from Fukushima caused 484 deaths in Houston. If there had been radiation-related deaths in Texas,
Thorium: The Artisanal Nuclear Energy
While reading an article touting the benefits of thorium as a fuel for nuclear reactors, author Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry veered into this paragraph: Within the energy analysis community, nuclear advocates are one hipster subset. But as always when we're talking about hipsters, there's a subset within the subset. And these energy hipsters are pushing a nuclear technology that has all the advantages of traditional nuclear and none of the drawbacks. Its name is thorium. So does this mean that thorium powers artisanal nuclear energy? Must the operators (men and women) grow elaborate beards? Gobry zooms away for this idea about as fast as he had it, but we find the idea of thorium fans as a hipper-than-thou cohort of already hip nuclear energy advocates weirdly appealing as well as weird. --- But not necessarily without serious support, though from the least hip group imaginable: China is developing a new design of nuclear power plant in an attempt to reduce its reliance on
Fennovoima applies for VVER reactor
Fennovoima has asked for permission from the Finnish government to construct a Russian AES-2006 nuclear plant at its Hanhikivi site, near Pyhäjoki.The company, which was formed in 2007 by the Voimaosakeyhtiö group of Finnish industrial and energy companies, was awarded a decision-in-principle in 2010 to construct a new nuclear plant of 1500-2500 MWe capacity. At the time, Fennovoima had been considering Areva's EPR and SWR-1000 along with Toshiba's ABWR as possible reactor designs. Now that it has decided to construct Rosatom's AES-2006 plant, which uses a 1200 MWe-class reactor, Fennovoima has had to submit an application to amend the 2010 decision-in-principle to include the smaller overall plant capacity and different design.Fennovoima's submission of supplementary information follows a recent ruling by the country's Chancellor of Justice that the original 2010 decision-in-principle remains valid despite the changes to the project. Finland's Green League - a member of the six-part



 
nuclear energy examples, энергия связи ядра, Atomic energy, ATOMIC ENERGY and more...
load menu