Politicians and Election, Vote in Freedom, Actively Participate in Democracy, Vote for Change, Online referendum
left right close

Afghanistan war

> global > Events > Afghanistan war
Afghanistan war is ready for your opinion, support and vote. Vote online NOW!
 
photo Afghanistan war - support

Afghanistan war - support

The war began on October 7 2001 as the U.S. military operation was launched in response to the September 11, 2001 attacks
Afghanistan war - against

Afghanistan war - against

Click, if you do not support Afghanistan war. Say why.

Online election results for "Afghanistan war - support" in graph.

graph
Graph online : Afghanistan war
Full functionality only if Javascript and Flash is enabled
he War in Afghanistan, which began on October 7, 2001 as the U.S. military operation Operation Enduring Freedom, was launched by the United States with the United Kingdom in response to the September 11, 2001 attacks. The stated purpose of the invasion was to capture Osama bin Laden, destroy al-Qaeda, and remove the Taliban regime which had provided support and safe harbor to al-Qaeda.Two military operations in Afghanistan seek to establish control over the country. Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) is a combat operation involving coalition partners led by the United States against Al Qaeda remnants, primarily in the eastern and southern parts of the country along the Pakistan border. OEF is not a NATO operation, although some coalition partners are NATO members. Approximately 20,000 troops ...
for0against   This is a myth that Afghanistan is the graveyard of invaders, but please define invaders. This is a war, either you win it or lose it!, RAHEELSABOOR
for7against   It's going to end just like Vietnam., Galileo
for3against   I think this war is hopeless. Everyone that has gone into that country, has gotten nothing but coffins from it. I think that we need to stop sending soldiers there to die., Lucy
for1against   If we cannot nuke whole region and get over it! Send boys home.U.N.is joke! We should close our borders for foreigners, no scholarships to Arabs,Pakistani,and rest of sand n......!, scorpion31
Current preference ratio
for Afghanistan war - support

General McChrystal's Afghan war Plan


UNIFORMED ARMY VS. INSURGENTS IN CIVILIAN CLOTHES 1. First thing we should recognize that the United States has the most well equipped military in the world. 2. But Taliban or Al Quaeda forces mostly combat against our uniformed troops in civilian, folk clothes with the plenty supply of deadly weapons from the questionable sources. Their manpower supply seems to have endless resources from many nations. We must have the enough manpower to fight against them and to let the religiously hard headed populations learn they are on the wrong way. It is the culture war for a new social value system. ...


USA bargains one trouble with another in Afghanistan


US General Stanley McChrystal is now the commander of US and NATO troops in Afghanistan instead of General David McKiernan. None of high-ranking officials of the Pentagon could explain the reason why the previous commander was dismissed and why Mr. McChrystal could handle the Taliban better than Mr. McKiernan could. US Defense Secretary Robert Gates only said that the United States was in need of a new military command and a new thinking because of a new strategy for the war-torn country. Anyone who takes interest in history will probably see the likeness between the recent rotation and the ...


US air-raid kills over 100 civilians in Farah


Residents of the Bala Boluk district in western Farah province on Tuesday claimed more than one hundred 'innocent people' have been killed in the Monday's air offensive by the US forces.The air-strike in Bala Boluk district came after an insurgent attack on a police check post that killed six people and three others on spy charges on Sunday.Following the militant attack, locals say, the American forces bombarded Grani village, inflecting huge casualties to non-combatants.Dr Atiqullah, a resident of the village, told Pajhwok Afghan News the bombardment destroyed the whole village and some of ...


[TOP 4]

> Afghanistan war > News

Focus: Hillary Clinton - Feb 27, 2015
Foreign governments gave millions to foundation while Clinton was at State Dept. - The Washington Post Green groups divided on Hillary Clinton's oil interest ties - Reuters Hillary Clinton Won’t Talk About Keystone. And Greens Are OK With That. - NationalJournal.com Hillary Clinton’s Complex Corporate Ties - WSJ Clinton foundation received up to $81m from clients of controversial HSBC bank - The Guardian Hillary Clinton paid $300,000 for her Silicon Valley speech to explain what ails the middle class (VIDEO) - Yahoo Finance No Crudités, but Hillary Clinton Still Has a Long List of Demands for Speeches - NYTimes.com Hillary’s State Department OK’d Bill Clinton’s big-money speeches - POLITICO U.S. State Department spokeswoman Psaki defends Clinton Foundation donation - The Washington Post VIDEO: Psaki: Ethics Deal Broken By The Clinton Foundation? No problem - whitehousedossier White House dodges questions on Clinton Foundation donations - Washington Time
Skipping The Speech for All the Wrong Reasons
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad to hear that Congress members will skip Netanyahu's speech no matter what reason they offer. Here are some of them: It's too close to Netanyahu's election. (That doesn't persuade me. If we had fair, open, publicly funded, un-gerrymandered, verifiably counted elections, then "politics" wouldn't be a dirty word and we would want politicians to show themselves doing things to try to please us before, during, and after elections. I want them acting that way now, even with our broken system. I don't want the U.S. interfering in Israeli elections, but allowing a speech is hardly the same as backing coups in Ukraine and Venezuela or giving Israel billions of dollars worth of weapons every year.) The Speaker didn't ask the President. (This is likely the big reason that Democrats are promising to skip the speech. I'm actually amazed more of them haven't made that promise. Netanyahu seemed to me to miss the extent to which the United States has become a term-limited
Did Berkeley Just Save Us From Drones or Target Us With Drones?
Cities and states across the United States have been taking various actions against drones, while the federal government rolls ahead with project fill the skies. Robert L. Meola has been working for years now to get Berkeley to catch up with other localities and claim its usual spot at the forefront of movements to pass good resolutions on major issues. Now Berkeley has acted and Meola says "This is NOT what I/we asked for." Here's what they asked for: Establishing a Two Year Moratorium on Drones in BerkeleyFrom: Peace and Justice CommissionRecommendation: Adopt a Resolution adopting a two year moratorium on drones in Berkeley.Financial Implications: Unknown And what they got: Action: 11 speakers.  M/S/C (Bates/Maio) to: 1) adopt a one-year moratorium on the use of unmanned aircraft systems, or “drones” by the Berkeley Police Department, 2) ask the Council to develop a policy for police use of drones, and 3) to authorize the use of drones by the Berkeley Fire Department for
The True Nobel Candidates for the true Nobel Peace Prize 2015
Source: http://www.nobelwill.org/index.html?tab=7 The Norwegian Nobel Committee ignores the testament of Nobel. They claim that the “champions of peace” Nobel described in his will no longer exist. To end this charade we have seen no alternative to lifting the curtain of secrecy they hide their waywardness behind. The Nobel Committee has pursued its own ideas and failed to see how the expressions Nobel used and the promise he gave to Bertha von Suttner to “do something big for the movement” (italics added) leave no room for doubt what “champions of peace” Nobel intended to support. Expressed in modern language: When Nobel wished to support the “champions of peace,” he meant the movement and the persons who work for a demilitarized world, for law to replace power in international politics, and for all nations to commit to cooperating on the elimination of all weapons instead of competing for military superiority. This is the content of the prize and as the legally bindi



 
arguments for and against war in afghan, war in afghanistan, afghanistan war arguments -wiki, anti war movement pictures, afghanistan and iraq war, arguments on afghanistan war, afghanistan war argument, arguments for the afghan war, war in afghanistan arguments, Arguments for Afghanistan war, the arguement for the afghan war, anti war movements, arguments against the war in afghanistan, arguments that are for the afghan war, arguments for war afghanistan, arguments in favor of war in afghanistan, afganistan war pictures and more...
load menu